Sunday, April 21, 2013

Boston: Making and Faking

Where to start?
So many have been doing such great work exposing this bad piece of acting..
A stratagem with a very sinister aim.
The creation of an ongoing trauma based control of the masses..


I wanted to point out some photos of the scene that were strange, on top of all the other images and scenes we have seen provided through the media.
I haven't blogged for ages, but this is just way to obvious to let slip...
These images are from a photo stream on flicr, that was taken by a member of the public from an office near the scene.
These images might have some copyright so i'll post them up here, but with the link to the flicr site they are from...thanks A.Peasant :)..

The first image is at the finish line after the "explosion"
These photos are in sequence.

NOTICE FENCE INTACT AND FLAGS INTACT.



Photo # DSC03150
The area seems pretty clear....considering..140 INJURED ...chaotic scenes. people panicking?
Even the barricades and street lamps are not damaged.
but lots of "personnel" present.

Note the fence is unscathed, flags are still standing and the area is clear, even on the opposite side of the road.
Oopps, not for long!

So, in the next shot we see...Trash the fence guys!!!!!!!



Photo # DCS03158
GUYS, People, security uniformed personell trashing the fence, and flags, well AWAY from the injured
IT's not as if they are ripping it apart to let in Emergency services or paramedics..
Why are they doing this to the fence?

SOMETHING IS NOT RIGHT HERE...is it?

They are trashing the fence/barrier to make it look like the damage was done by the blast...what a crock..

And the final image... flags strewn and barricades chaotically arranged all over the place...on both sides of the road, which i will add should be a sealed off crime scene by now..
TRASHED.
Not by the "bomb" though...by these guys above..

There is just so much wrong with this how can you not comment?



Photo DSC03162

Images are found HERE








EXCELLENT work being done by Aangirfan.
Kenny's Sideshow
Twelfth Bough
Penny for your thoughts
http://cotocrew.wordpress.com/2013/04/20/smoking-gun-that-boston-marathon-bombing-was-staged/

"hyper realistic" productions are there to influence and create trauma.
These situations and events are believed by the public as we have had so much hollywood big budget productions and Movies to influence us all of our lives and can not tell the difference.
Most of the people are in a manufactured reality which has been set up to influence our thoughts and actions.
That's how disassociated from reality we really are..
These E$vents are becoming more numerous and onerous by the month...
Don't get me started on the double amputee guy and the "cowboy " pushing him....really.

A13



Thursday, September 27, 2012

Over 'N' Out

Since the inception of the Thirteenth Monkey blog in Feb 2011 I've always wondered how long it would be until this day would come.

 Well, after some soul searching and introspection I've decided to call it a day, that is to end this blog.
I've got no time to research, too many commitments that take up time and of course work,in the real world...
I'm finding the so called work life balance to be an unattainable malady.
My life has changed dramatically since i started this blog..some things good some bad.
So, some areas of my life and the time I have for them have to be prioritised...and unfortunately this blog is being made redundant with deep regret and tears in my eyes..

I've met some wonderful bloggers from all around the world and have been inspired by so much of the body of work that is out there, and i have the deepest of respect for them...I'm sure you know who they are, they are in the list on my side bar.

Thank you to all the people out there that took the time to read what i post about and to leave comments.
It's always awesome to have feedback, and extra info and another point of veiw or perception..

I just want to say thank you to A.Peasant from Twelfth Bough, Aangirfan, Nobody, Aferrismoon, Penny for your thoughts,Winter Patriot, Suraci, Kenny from Kenny's sideshow, Timster, Chucky, Ray from Da black whole, Hei Hu Quan from Undeleted Evidence, Ed Encho  Honk Bonk Man, and everyone who gave me inspiration and supported my work here..
THANK YOU :).

You might catch me in the rant lounge occasionally having a shirazzled rant   one day..... :)

See you in the comments.







Over' n' Out
A13

Sunday, September 9, 2012

Aurora Cinema Shootings = Inside JOB conspiracy according to court documents

When this event occurred, we hypothesized that it was an inside job.
Now it looks even more strange ....
You would think "official" documents like these would be confidential rather than leaked out in the "media".
Or is this just more disinfo to confuse the whole case and set up red herrings?
My gut says it is so...

Newly released court documents in the Aurora, CO theater “Batman massacre” case reveals startling inside accusations about who may actually be behind the shootings that left at least 70 people either dead or injured in the early morning hours of July 20th.


Friday's report by the online version of Denver's Westword Magazine details shocking claims made by, what appears to be, a new victim in a case that has throttled a community still in mourning over the tragic events. According to the court documents an individual, whose name has been officially redacted from the documents, came forward to file a “Motion to Intervene” for the right to be reasonably heard under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (a)(4), for the purposes of presenting newly discovered evidence to the court.


The stunning accusations, dated August 27, reveal a startling story by the claimant as having been visited at home by police chief Dan Oates and Dist. Atty. Carol Chambers where they forced the unnamed individual to testify as a fake victim of the shootings, under the threat of being arrested for prostitution and escort services and charity fraud, for the purposes of garnering an easy conviction against alleged shooter James Holmes.

But not before being shot by the police chief in “non-life-threatening areas” of the body, according to the motion, to appear as having been shot by James Holmes himself. The motion also claims that it is likely some of the victims in the theater were merely paid actors working on behalf of the conspirators and wants multiple individuals involved in the situation to take polygraph tests to prove their innocence.

Claiming that their conscience will not let fraudulent testimony contribute to an improper conviction of James Holmes, the new mystery victim asked that the judge submit the case to the FBI and the US Congress for further investigation into the alleged conspiracy. The judge, however, instead of taking a closer look, decided to strike down the motion as fraudulent, claiming the motion as likely forged by an individual or individuals unassociated with the events. The judge also suggested the situation be investigated by the Arapahoe County Sheriff's office and those responsible for the motion be taken into custody by the Arapahoe County Department of Human Services and “referred to the appropriate mental health agency.”

But it may in fact be the judge that needs the mental attention as all the evidence collected in the case thus far seems to point toward mostly agreeing with the individual who filed the claim, despite the media and the court's attempts to suppress any evidence that doesn't support the official story. Multiple and corroborating eyewitness testimony stated what appeared to be multiple individuals involved in the shooting, including supporting official dispatch audio. Individuals interviewed by local media immediately after the event also claimed to have seen teargas canisters being deployed in the theater simultaneously from two different directions, in addition to side-by-side images of James Holmes prior to the shootings and the orange haired individual taken into custody as the alleged lone gunmen after the event looks startlingly like two different individuals. There also seems to have been two different gas masks found at the scene, in addition to other damning evidence that doesn't jive with the official version of the events.

The individual who filed the motion also added that they wanted their portion of the charity to be donated to James Holmes' prison commissary, after using the money to find Mr. Holmes “real” attorneys who are actually willing to act in the honest defense of James Holmes, or the individual in custody for the crime.
The motion, as certified by the Arapahoe County Dist. Atty. and public defenders offices, was sent via the United States Postal Service, then was quickly denied and subsequently released days ago to the public for reasons yet to be determined.

Perhaps one of the most telling aspects of the circumstances, however, happens to be the creepy dead silence about the motion by the media, especially considering every little detail about a situation like this is normally scrutinized at every angle after being groomed with a fine tooth comb and examined under a microscope.
It was just weeks ago that certain local media outlets were considering suing for access to court records because, according to those outlets, the community had a right to know so the victims and the community could more easily begin the healing process and find some semblance of closure. Perhaps information that may open new wounds, however, regardless of how accurate or important that information may be, may not be the kind of information they were looking for.(end snip)
article sourced from  Examiner.
On the Subject of the examiner, another blogger over at American Everyman has this to say:
"Who would write such a ridiculous letter and send it to the courts?
And why would they include the statement “James is being framed by Phillip Anschutz, police chief Dan Oates, and the illuminati (sic)”?
The key to understanding who wrote the letter is looking at how it was handled. When the judge released it, he released key evidence in a new crime in and of itself. He tipped off the culprit who is now probably in Dubai or somewhere non-extradition.
Correct me if I am wrong, but wouldn’t releasing this fraudulent motion constitute a crime in itself? Does it make the judge an accessory after the fact? Does it provide aid and comfort (and a head start) to the criminal?
Should releasing this document disqualify the judge from sitting on this case?
All good questions.
But one thing it does do, it makes any suspicion of Phillip Anschutz seem like crack-pottery and to that end it’s immediately written about by none other than one of Anschutz’ own publications….
what a coincidence."(end snip)

So it was reported in a publication, that is owned by the person it accuses of conspiracy..this is very suspicious.
And enough to be concerned that these docs are in place to put off others from claiming conspiracy on real grounds..and to source the true perpetrators and those responsible for this event.
OR it could be to discredit and deny real witnesses from coming forward, to keep them in fear for their lives if they reveal any truth....Some of those involved in the Aurora shootings have met with highly suspicious deaths.
The Nurse who tended the injured for example..http://aangirfan.blogspot.com.au/2012/08/batman-colorado-shootings-mysterious.html

This is the initial post that we complied just after this false flag event
 http://thirteenthmonkey.blogspot.com.au/2012/07/the-opening-ceremony-dark-night-aurora.html

More court docs http://www.scribd.com/doc/105211877/Order-Regarding-Motion-to-Intervene-in-James-Holmes-Case

 INTERESTING post from Scott Creighton.
 http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2012/09/08/aurora-massacre-another-effort-to-discredit-growing-suspicion-of-the-official-story/

Video: The James Holmes Conspiracy (2012 Full Documentary) 

A13

Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Australia: Drone Surveillance + Data Retention = Police State

Australia is supposed to be a democratic and a free country..
no, not for much longer.
We are heading into a dystopian gestapo police state, keeping lockstep with the other famously "free" countries of the world.
We have read recently of two "new" plans in the official media, that are priming us to accept this as inevitable.
Pre programming so called free and innocent citizens into accepting data retention and drone surveillance, which, in a so called free society is abhorrent...
We are all now guilty until proven innocent..where will this lead?

Data-retention plan likened to Gestapo tactics

Critics of the Federal Government's plan to store the internet and phone data of every Australian say it amounts to constant surveillance.
Attorney-General Nicola Roxon yesterday announced the controversial plan, which would see internet and phone companies storing the data of every user for up to two years.

The idea is currently being considered by a parliamentary committee, and Ms Roxon insists there would be strict privacy measures in place to make sure the information is only used by crime-fighting agencies when it is needed.
But the plan has drawn the ire of many, including Greens Senator Scott Ludlum, who says the move to mandatory data collection is an invasion of privacy.
"These proposals are a sweeping expansion of surveillance powers," he said.
Liberal MP Steve Ciobo has taken an even tougher stance.
"I think that this proposal is akin to tactics that we would have seen utilised by the Gestapo," he said.

"The proposal is absolutely outrageous (and) I can't understand why the Attorney-General hasn't at least waited for the committee to do its work," he said.

He says it would effectively mean the roll-out of real-time surveillance of everyone in Australia.
But Ms Roxon says there will be safeguards in place to make sure the information is not abused.

"It has always been a balancing act between providing proper protections for the community who expect to be safe (and) expect our law enforcement agencies to be able to do track down and prosecute those involved in criminal activity or those intent on causing harm," Ms Roxon said.

The Australian Federal Police are backing the proposal.(end snip)....of course they are :)

and really WHO are these criminals?????
Who and why are they going to spy on us ordinary Aussies???
What do they fear about the people? do they want us to "self regulate"?

but don't worry..if there is nothing to hide..they will also be able to see what you are up to when you are out and about and not online or on the phone..

Drones Down Under

Australia's fledgling UAV industry may be about to get a big wake-up call from China.

It's dawn as 24-year-old Justin Gong and his team stride down to the launch point at Mrs Macquarie's Chair.
Before them lies the stunning vista of Sydney Harbour: city skyline, Harbour Bridge, Opera House, all bathed in a golden light.

Within two minutes, they've unpacked and launched their drones to record this perfect sunrise.
To passing joggers the team appears to be just a bunch of weekend model aircraft enthusiasts.
Police and park rangers drive by, not bothering to stop.

But looks are deceptive.

Justin is at the controls of his third generation X650 V8 - a quadrocopter the size of a wheelie bin lid. The UAV steadies, then rockets upwards. Live video streams back to his control monitor. The sales pitch is impressive:
"This one can go up to two kilometres above the land and also two kilometres away from your home position and this is around $3,000 for the full unit... and it can go up to about 70 kilometres per hour," Justin said.

Drone accessories include night-vision capability, GPS navigation, auto-pilot and automatic return home.

Justin says he comes from a military family. He's the son of a retired Chinese Air Force fighter pilot.
He moved to Sydney five years ago to work as a freelance news cameraman and film maker.
(Ed: Spying perhaps???? since the Chinese are buying up all our residential real estate and farming land..)

Apparently Chinese TV viewers have also been enjoying a drones-eye view of some big Australian news stories.
Justin shoots Australian news reports for China's Phoenix TV network.

Justin Gong says XAircraft is developing three versions of its technology: recreational, commercial and military.

But he says the Chinese military is also keen to learn from the young cost-conscious entrepreneurs, and that XAircraft is now working with the People's Liberation Army.

"We have the beginning of cooperation with them and we provide our carrier, and they put their own technology, the equipment on it," he said.

"Because it is nimble, it is very small, it can go in a door or out a window or under the trees, which a normal helicopter can't do."

According to Justin, it's the perfect platform for stealthy surveillance.

Unlike the US, Australia has long embraced the potential of civilian UAVs, introducing the world's first national drone legislation in 2002.


But the breathtaking speed of technological advances has swiftly rendered those regulations obsolete.

"Things have changed and we now need to bring the rules up to date," Mr Gibson said. "We are trying to guess ahead."
 Xaircraft's Justin Gong and his high-performance craft don't appear to be governed by any rules. Justin says he self-regulates. (end snip)

Love the Red string bracelet..where have we seen this before?

 So, he "self regulates"? really..do we believe this?
No.










So what has become of Australia?and the so called free world that we are devolving into police state, surveillance and spying on ordinary citizens.


High Def cameras, and  PAYLOAD of something onboard...very doable.

A13

FURTHER READING : http://cryptogon.com/?p=624

http://cryptogon.com/?p=31139

Sunday, August 12, 2012

Politically Correct

Are you, or is anyone you know, Politically Correct?  
If so, you may want to consider the consequences.

Consequences, you say?  What consequences? 

Well, how about this one.  Being politically correct runs the serious risk of you reducing yourself to a junk yard dog for the Thought Police.  Are you the property of the Thought Police?  Are they your masters? 

No, you say.  I am no one's property but my own. 

Oh really. 
Well here's a test. 

You hear someone saying, "I am against all of this illegal immigration.  I absolutely believe when illegal immigrants are caught they should be deported back to where they came from".   
Or, "I can't stand homosexuals.  They make me sick.  They are all going to go to hell".



Upon hearing these things, how do you react?  If you are a junk yard dog of the Thought Police, your reaction will be something like this:

"Woof!"  "Woof Woof!"  "There is somebody thinking incorrect thoughts!  How revolting they are!  I despise them! They must be corrected!  I will go tell them how despicable they are and let them know they are not okay with me!  I am entitled to do this because my masters told me so".





If you are not a junk yard dog of the Thought Police your reaction would be more along these lines:

"Whether I agree with them or not, everybody is entitled to their own opinion".

Which of these reactions is closest to your own way of thinking? 

This is no small thing.  You may honestly believe that your politically correct opinions are your own, but they may not be.  The more adamant you are about your popular politically correct opinion the more likely it is that your opinion is really not your own.  The more intolerant you are of other people's viewpoints and opinions, the more likely it is that you have been brainwashed into holding your politically correct opinion.  To put it simply, you have been cultified.  You have been Jim Jonesed. You are no longer you.  You are the property of the Thought Police and will spend years of your life barking at, snarling at, attacking and reporting on anyone you run across who is thinking unauthorized thoughts.  Is that really something you set out to be?   An intolerant attack dog of the Thought Police? 

Do you believe that what other people think needs to be policed?  Do you believe that people with viewpoints other than your own are automatically bad?  Do differing viewpoints offend you and make you angry?  If so, why?

If I like yellow and you like blue does it take anything away from you?  No it does not.  The same is true even if I am a racial separatist.  A militia member.  A neo nazi.  A felon.  Even if I question the holocaust.  Even if I am a Muslim, or an atheist, or a Christian or a Jew.  Even if I'm a liberal or a conservative.  The nature of the difference is irrelevant.  I can feel 100% different about a barrel full of things than you do and it will not affect you in any way.  It does not take anything from you.  It does not prevent you from having your own thoughts and feelings and viewpoints.  You will retain everything that is rightfully yours.  It is not a threat to you in any way when I see things differently than you do.

My thoughts and opinions, viewpoints and beliefs have nothing to do with you.  These are a part of my identity and I have every right to them, as much right as you have to yours.  My beliefs coexist in this world with your beliefs, there is no problem here.  So why then should you feel offended and angry at my rightful opinion?  You could only feel offense and anger if you are intolerant of other people's rightful opinions.  Your intolerance is a form of aggression against me.  You want to use force to try to take away what is rightfully mine.  Now which of us is wrong?  Who is harming who?

The simple reality is that everyone has their own thoughts and feelings and these are not up to anyone else to determine.  I feel and think what I feel and think, and so do you.  There is nothing wrong with this, it is normal and healthy and necessary.  The one thing any of us have to offer is our own unique way of seeing things.  It behooves us to listen to each other.  If we don't agree it doesn't mean anything.  It is not a reason to become enemies or to fight. 

If we try to understand each other's position we will probably be able to understand why we feel the way we do.  Once we understand why certain feelings and beliefs are held we can see that there are reasons behind them, that it's not just senseless or hateful thinking.  It may be misguided or mistaken, but we can understand that if we saw what they saw, we would feel the way they feel.  This is not a crime.  If we honestly care about justice and peace then we are obligated to make the effort to understand other people's positions.
Once we understand each other, we can see the bigger picture.  We don't have to agree or  embrace each other's beliefs.  We can retain our individuality totally, but we can at least understand why we feel the way we do.  We can see it is not a threat to us.  We can simply agree to disagree.  We can still be on courteous terms, we could even go out to lunch with each other.  This is a good outcome.  If we are civilized people we want a good outcome.  We want to be able to get along with everyone we can.  All it takes is some tolerance, some respect, and to make the effort to understand why other people see things the way they do.  If we do this the odds of experiencing good outcomes and improved relationships are much improved.  We can still respect the person but disagree with their opinion.   We must make room for one another because the alternative is destruction.  Will we kill our way to happiness?  It doesn't work that way.  It never has and it never will. 

If we don't even try to understand someone else then how can we judge them?  If we don't understand why someone else sees things so very differently than we do, then we do not know the whole story.  We only know our own side of the story.  It is always a terrible mistake to tell ourselves that only our side of the story is the whole story.  It is not.  As long as there is someone else involved then they have a side of the story too.  To ignore it or dismiss it without listening and apply our judgment to them is evil.  That's right.  It is sheer evil. 

It is evil because we don't care about knowing the truth.  When we don't care about what the truth is, then we are lost in dishonesty.  We are dishonest with our own selves.  Who can we be without truth?  What will we become when we don't care what the whole truth is?  Can we become wise and just when we don't care about truth?  No. We can only become ignorant and unfair when we care more about protecting our own position than we care about understanding the positions of everyone involved.  This is the only way we can get to the whole truth.

But what do we do when somebody is saying something that we strongly disagree with? 

Until you develop skills like tact and humor, there is only one acceptable way to respond, and that is to shut up.  If you are incapable of letting someone have their opinion then the problem is with you, not with them.  They are not doing anything wrong.  They are not doing anything "to you".  If however you attack them for their thoughts and feelings then you are definitely out of line.  You have no right to batter anyone with your fists or your words.  After all, who the hell are you and what makes you better or right or anything else?  You have no right to dictate what others must think or feel.  You wouldn't appreciate someone doing that to you, would you?  Then don't do it to anyone else.  If you truly can't tolerate what someone else is saying then leave.  Be polite, but walk away.  It's really that simple. 

Ostensibly, you hold your strong politically correct opinion because you want the world to be a better place.  But if you truly want the world to be a better place then you must instinctively know that we can't get there through violence, abuse and anger.  We have to learn to accept one another as is and never make the mistake of stepping on people by dictating to them what they must think and feel.  They are capable of doing their own thinking and feeling.  It is not our place to dictate anything to anyone else.  Policing other people's opinions is not our job. 

What our job is, is to learn how to handle it.  Gracefully.  Fairly.  Objectively.  Respectfully.  That is, if that is the kind of world you want to live in.  If that is the way you would like to be treated.  If it is, then you had better treat others that way, and not just when it's easy but when it's hard.  That's when it matters most. That's how we make real changes in this world, changes for the better.  When we are fair with people.  When we show respect for people by making human life more important than being right.  When we make sure to preserve other people's dignity when interacting with them and don't feel entitled to tear into anyone for what they believe.  There is no such right, I don't care what your cause is or how strongly you feel about it. 

Understand, this is not about what other people think, this is about you.  This is about who you are.  This is about the kind of person you are.  Are you a good and decent person?  Then act like one.  If you behave like a bully, like a junk yard dog of the thought police, then that is what you are.  That is not being a good and decent person.  That is being oppressive and controlling, judgmental and small minded.  Hello?  Think about it. 

Letting other people be who they are is the most powerful truth in the world.  Let them be who they are.  Let each of us decide for ourselves what we think.  If we don't do that, if we slam doors in people's faces, if we treat them with disrespect because of their beliefs, we are bringing misery into this world.  We are bringing resentment and injustice into the world.  We are forcing the creation of separation between equal beings, making some "good" and others "bad".  This is wrongful and destructive.  It does not make the world better, it makes things harder for everyone.  These are the seeds of war.  What do you help by planting them?

It is so important to show respect to everyone, it is absolutely necessary.  That we disagree with them is irrelevant, that is never grounds to treat people with disrespect or cruelty.  How could it be?  What nonsense.  We are not the end all and be all of the world, no one is.  We are not special, no one is.  We are all equal beings.  We all count.  Regardless of whether or not WE happen to agree or disagree with anyone else we are still equal beings and we still deserve to be treated with respect. 

As long as we can agree to disagree, we can find a way to get along.  It is only when somebody somewhere decides they must have their way and refuses to show a basic respect for others that everything comes apart.  That is when violence begins. Injustice, cruelty, torture, imprisonment, intolerance, taking sides, name calling, nasty lies, manipulations... all of the things that tear relationships, friendships, and nations apart.

Everyone deserves to be heard. 
Every side must be given equal time to tell its portion of the story.
All sides must be considered before we can draw conclusions about anything.
It is far better to assume that everyone is at least partially right, rather than to assume only you are right.  When everyone has a valid viewpoint, when everyone is right, we are much more likely to work together to find answers than we are if we refuse to acknowledge that other people actually have reasons for feeling what they do.

Political correctness is a lie.  It is exactly the opposite of what it pretends to be.  Political correctness is a method of controlling the minds of others.  It is oppressive and deceptive.  It turns people into monsters.  It broadcasts orders to attack others, to behave with incredible selfishness and intolerance, it makes people feel entitled to behave rudely.  What is "correct" anyway?  Correct is different depending on the people looking at the equation.  To be so arrogant as to presume that you are automatically correct and no one else can be correct is dishonest at best, and fascistic at its core.  If you believe in freedom then being politically correct is a total contradiction.  It can only be one or the other.  Either you believe in freedom or you believe that people must be controlled by force.  Which is it?

If what someone else is saying makes you want to get in their face or hurl labels at them like racist, or denier, then you must stop yourself and ask yourself one question, "What's it to me what somebody else thinks?"   Is it your problem what they think?  No. Is it within your control to make them think otherwise?  No. Is it your right to dictate to them what they should believe?  No.   Are you responsible for what anyone else thinks?  No.  Then why are you carrying their luggage?  Let them carry their own luggage while you relax.  It's not yours to worry about.

You must accept that you have no power to change anyone but yourself.  You cannot make people see things differently, at least not by attacking or disrespecting them.  They will definitely not consider your perspective if you show no respect for theirs.  You get back what you put out and if you put out a brick in the face don't expect hugs in return. 

It is also worth questioning why you feel the need to be so controlling of others.  If you're losing friends over disagreements in matters of opinion, maybe you need to look at you for a change.  Maybe you need to mind your own business instead of somebody else's business for a change.  Why do you expect anyone to embrace your position in lieu of their own when all you do is come at them with insults and disrespect?  You are only throwing gasoline on the fire when you do that, and yet you expect them to forfeit their honest beliefs and step over to your way of thinking?  Is that silly or what?

No matter who anyone is, or what they think, treat them with the same respect you want to be treated with.  It is never about them, it is always about you.  Your behavior is all you have control over, are you doing your best?  Really?  Is showing off your intolerance for others something to take pride in?  Or is understanding that everyone has equal rights to their beliefs something to take pride in?  I'd say it's the latter.

Anyone can be intolerant in the name of some greater good.  Just like the Spanish Inquisition.  Be careful who your masters are.  If you don't you will soon find yourself steeped in hate and self-righteousness even as you claim to be against them. 

Bottom line:  don't ever let anyone else tell you what to think.  Think for yourself.  And when you get to the point that you can defend someone else's right to their opinion, even though you disagree with what they're saying, then you'll have done more to do good in this world than you'll ever know. (snip)


This awesome piece was written by Ang over at Think Or Be Eaten and has been re posted with permission from the Author....
Political correctness is such a dangerous precedent and  needs to be examined for what it is...and invalidated and deconstructed...
I refuse to be politically correct, and there needs to be more people who see the inherent dangers in this form of self censorship and denial of truth.
A13

Saturday, July 28, 2012

Olympic Opening Ceremony: first thoughts

Just popped over to kenny's place where he has an open thread about the Opening ceremony..
These are my first thoughts:

"Started with Jerusalem...ended with hey JUDE..
full of zionist weirdness,... 
The industrialist guy with the top hat and the red book at the beginning IMO was Rothschild...
NWO themes, children being scared by demons, a giant figure of death plus kids in hospital beds.. and other bizzre anomolies..the bicycle riding/ angel/ moth things ( look like the moths from the silence of the lambs movie poster)
luciferic as hell...the cauldron thing with it's petals created a ring of fire that resembled a giant eye..very sinister looking. too many things to mention here..but yeah..it's the zion olympics alright. 
I took notes through the whole thing and trying to unpack now..i'm going to watch it again and see what i missed first time around.
a freak show really."

I'll be updating as soon as, i'll view it again and i'm sure i'll notice things that weren't obvious the first time around..
also been searching for the speech transcript of the director of the ceremony, Danny Boyle, and the links have been wiped off the net..
looks like a Rothschild (red book =red shield)
"the creation of a Jerusalem, of a new world" is part of what he said..
Ive got pages of notebook scrawl to redecipher, as i took notes all through it and i'll post up as soon as..
what do you think about what you saw if you watched it??




OK one more thing is the image of this;;; the giant baby, with it's head split in half..what does that imply?
what does that imagery have to do with the NHS in any case?


















What is the point of this as relevant in the NHS scheme of things???
I've read it's something else..http://merovee.wordpress.com/2012/07/28/the-olympics-the-giant-baby-the-dark-knight-rises/

and considering the rest of the opening ceremony and it's contents and imagery it's something to be considered..
and YES, Tubular Bells was the theme song to the move the Exorcist ....
reminds me of the "rosemary's baby movie"
I'll post my observations up in the next few days..busy with family at the moment, but noticed in the replay of the Opening ceremony that it was edited..as i watched live the opening ceremony here in OZ at 04.30 am..so much was missing in the viewer friendly timeslot...
more to come..

A13

Saturday, July 21, 2012

The Opening Ceremony: The Dark Night Aurora 2012

The Night is darkest just before the dawn.......
 The darkest hour has long been used figuratively to mean 'the lowest ebb' and there are many such examples of it in print dating from the late 1700s.
The English theologian and historian Thomas Fuller appears to be the first person to commit the notion that 'the darkest hour is just before the dawn' to print. His religious travelogue A Pisgah-Sight Of Palestine And The Confines Thereof, 1650, contains this view:
It is always darkest just before the Day dawneth.
The source of the proverb isn't known. It may be Fuller himself, or he may have been recording a piece of folk wisdom. In 1858, much later than Fuller of course, Samuel Lover attributed the notion to the Irish, in Songs and Ballads:
There is a beautiful saying amongst the Irish peasantry to inspire hope under adverse circumstances:- "Remember," they say, "that the darkest hour of all. is the hour before day."
One week until the Olympic opening ceremony and we see another opening ceremony of sorts..A FALSE FLAG EVENT..
the massacre in the movie theatre in Aurora, Colarado USA..at the midnight screening of the latest Batman offering.
I am not about to unpack this as it's left to those far more capable than me..( hi aferris and ray)
but I will suggest a few things..an "opening ceremony", to that of the dark night..
the darkness that descends..an event that opens up something??
a pre event?
A manufactured massacre that preys upon times, dates, numbers and synchronicity?
And importantly..an Agenda.
So, what i'm doing is putting up some links and highlighting in bold, what stands out to me..
For a start the "gunman" was until recently, a neuroscience student.( a Mind Control like patsy /experiment?)
Aurora is approx 13 miles from Columbine, and 13 years later..
The massacre at Utoya, Norway, which is eerily similar in that children were targeted, in a place that is considered safe ( a local cinema and a peaceful little island) . with NO ready escape routes..they were in effect, trapped.
The Norway event was 363 days ago..on 22nd July 2011..
Plus the "lone gunman" survived and surrendered to authority..unharmed of course..really in the USA you could be killed for FAR less than mass killing of civilians..this is a big point to remember he was UNHARMED by Authority, which in it'self is a STAND out  point..

A quote from the article below is imperative to this event...


"Aurora is home to a large satellite intelligence operation at Buckley Air Force Base and the Pentagon confirmed members of the US armed forces were among those injured......."


that to me is reason alone that this would be a manufactured event.


These are just some things that stood out for me..but anyway.


This could be the darkness descending before the "light" of the Olympics event rises?


This could be some sort of pre event to what maybe comming up in the schedule of false flag events..including what may happen in the Olympics?? even on the deep hidden level?


'I'm the Joker': shooting suspect tells police
"The massacre was the worst mass shooting in the US since the 2007 Virginia Tech campus killing, in which 32 people died. Just 13 miles from the cinema is Columbine High School, where two students killed 12 classmates and a teacher in 1999.


"Holmes began his neuroscience course in June last year, but dropped out last month, without giving a reason. When he began renting his flat, he described himself on the application as "quiet and easygoing".

Aurora is home to a large satellite intelligence operation at Buckley Air Force Base and the Pentagon confirmed members of the US armed forces were among those injured."


OK, so it's starting to have a certain stench about it..

Here are some more links to some interesting takes on this event..
But imo, there is a connection to the "opening" ceremony to the 2012 Oympics in this event.


  http://copycateffect.blogspot.com.au/2012/07/dark-  knight-shooting.html


"As part of the advanced program in Denver, a James Holmes had been listed as making a presentation in May about Micro DNA Biomarkers in a class named "Biological Basis of Psychiatric and Neurological Disorders."


In academic achievement, "he was at the top of the top," recalled Riverside Chancellor Timothy P. White.



Holmes concentrated his study on "how we all behave," White added. "It's ironic and sad."
Ironic and sad hey..and very regrettable..How we all behave..maybe they have the technology to influence our behavior, like this? like Zombies?..
If he was TOP of the TOP...what would be the reason for this sudden violent lapse?? Maybe he was about to blow a whistle?? who knows? maybe a lab rat that knew too much?


I'm calling this guy out as a patsy that's for sure....


Oh BTW, you can find these guys at the Buckley Air force base.
THE 566th Intelligence Squaron, first established in WW2.

check them out..they have been around.


 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/566th_Intelligence_Squadron


Maybe part of the "STAY BEHIND" Gladio network, since they have been in existence for as long..


Quote from Wiki  page...
"The 566th Information Operations Squadron (IOS) began during World War II, when the 16th Photographic Technical Unit was activated on November 5, 1944, at Charleroi, Belgium. The 16th was a squadron to the 67th Tactical Reconnaissance Group and the 16th was assigned to several bases in Europe: Vogelsang, Limburg[disambiguation needed], and Eschwege, Germany, and France. After World War II, the unit moved to MacDill Field, Florida, where it was decommissioned on December 21, 1945. The 66th Reconnaissance Technical Squadron was Constituded on 15 November 1952 and Activated on 1 January 1953 at Shaw AFB. SC relocated to Shaw AFB, SC: 01 Jan–25 June 1953; Sembach AB, West Germany on 7 July 1953 and moved to Kaiserslautern, West Germany on 13 August 1953 till the unit was Inactivated on 8 February 1958. While the unit was insctive the 66th Reconnaissance Technical Squadron was Consolidated on 16 October 1984 and the New Unit was designated as the 16th Reconnaissance Technical Squadron.
The unit remained inactive until September 7, 1993, when the 16th Intelligence Squadron was activated at Buckley Air National Guard Base, Colorado. The unit was re-designated the 566th Operations Support Squadron (OSS) on October 1, 1995. Renamed later as the 566th Information Operations Squadron (IOS) on August 1, 2000, this unit aided Buckley in its transition from an Air National Guardbase to an active duty Air Force base." (snip)


and this is their Motto....and Logo....














looking forward to more unpacking..


Unpacking here: 

sourced from:Possible Second Shooter in tragic Batman Denver Shooting Eyewitness  Account aangirfan.blogspot.com.au/2012/07/dark-knight-in-denver-gladio.html http://cotocrew.wordpress.com/2012/07/20/18989/ http://cotocrew.wordpress.com/2012/07/20/james-holmes-mk-delta-and-weapoins-derived-from-fast- furious/ Another point to consider is that someone "let" the "gunman/men" into the cinema.... "About a couple of hours ago I was watching CNN and, live, on air, the newscaster was talking to a witness at the theater, who said another member of the audience took a call before the movie started. The person when to the back of the theater, near the exit, and appeared to open the door. About 15 minutes later, that's when the gunman burst into the theater. Now, the caller was on a cellphone and the newscaster was struggling to get the facts straight with them. That is what I understood the caller-witness was saying, but I felt the newscaster did not work hard enough to get this important fact cleared up entirely. Then, the newscaster seemed to drop that line of discussion to explore other elements of the experience from the witness. Please let me know if anyone else saw this, understood it similarly, or if any other news outlets have picked up on this detail."   THEN..another comment from same person:: "OK, I'm the guy that left the earlier message about a witness who saw another man, inside the theater, open the exit down so Holmes (or whoever -- let's remember he was wearing a gas mask) could enter the theater through the exit. Here is a link to an interview with that witness: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755884/
This links to Politics Nation website. On the left side, scroll down to the screen that has a black man being interviewed with the caption under the screen: "Witness: 'We tried to bear crawl our way out of there' -- then, at 4:49, he begins to talk about the man in front of him who receives a call on his cellphone, then gets up and cracks open the door for the gunman to burst through later. I don't know what scares me more about this: that there is a conspiracy of some sort...or that NO ONE, not the interviewer, not Sharpton, NO ONE -- picks up on this and questions him further about it."
another thought..the "gunman/men" were wearing gas masks it's reported...
what about this image from the murals at the Denver international Airport?? 
UPDATE: I found these images below of the carpark outside the cinema, aerial shot.. NOTICE the "bloodstains"...do they look real? I'm really not sure about this PsyOp..could it be a truly faked event? Like some have suggested in the Giffords shooting? The similarities between Loughner and Holmes are there..especially the facial expressions/ eye intensity.. But for you to see, here is the pic with the blood..does it look "randomized" how blood splatters when there are injuries like this?? OR does it look like it's been splashed about..in manner that has been deliberate?? like someone has walked along there splattering fake blood stuff all over the pavement?
Could this have been completely FAKED? something to think about there.. A13